指向性マイクで決めました。ただ大きい声とか音はどうしても拾っちゃいます。音質はいい感じだと思います。2年ほど使ってますが不調もないです

Love these mics for vocals. I have 4 of them now.

Ich bin Sängerin und habe mir sowohl das Audix OM2 als auch das Shure LM58 bestellt und beide Mikrofone ausgiebig getestet.Das Audix macht auf den ersten Blick einen sehr hochwertigen Eindruck. Es liegt sehr gut in der Hand und wäre rein optisch mein persönlicher Favorit gewesen.Das Mikrofon ist perfekt geeignet für Gesang und gibt einen extrem klaren und eher hochtonigen Klang ab. Kleine Fehler verzeiht es dafür nicht wirklich.Im Vergleich dazu klingt das Shure LM58 weicher und eher dumpf. Nach langem Testen und unterschiedlichen Songs, habe ich mich letztendlich für das Shure entschieden, da es besser zu meiner Stimme passt und tatsächlich den ein oder anderen kleinen Wackler verzeiht. ;-)Aber das ist glaub ich auch viel Geschmackssache.Hätte ich nicht zeitgleich das Shure getestet, hätte ich das Audix bestimmt behalten. Ich kann euch also nur raten, eure Favoriten zu bestellen und persönlich zu vergleichen.Fazit:Das Audix OM2 ist für seinen Preis (75€) ein Top Mikrofon, welches perfekt für Gesang ausgelegt ist. Es hat einen extrem klaren Klang und gibt besonders Feinheiten sehr gut wieder.Der "Klassiker", das Shure LM85 (109€), hat jedoch bei mir das Rennen gemacht, da es einfach besser zu meiner Stimme passte.

Fantastic mic. This should have become the "industry standard" a long time ago. This is a great dynamic, handheld, vocal mic that's made in the USA (Oregon). It has a reasonable price, a tighter polar pattern to reject feedback and bleed from the sides, and it sounds great. Compare this to the more expensive Chinese fakes of a made in Mexico product, and the Audix is a clear winner.I compared this carefully to my SM-58, and a number of more expensive dynamic mics: the OM5, Beyerdynamic TG-V70D, Sennheiser e945, and Telefunken M80. As far as the sound quality goes, with vocals, the biggest differences were with things like proximity effect. The TG-V70D had a lot more of it, and the e945 a little less. If you want to fatten a thin voice, or just sound like you're talking into a tube, get right on the mic. With the OM2, the proximity effect is very mild if you back off 1 inch or more. Proximity effect is often related to the tightness of the polar pattern.I found the OM2's hypercardioid pattern to be a little looser than an OM5, but tighter than the e945's supercardioid pattern. It was good at rejecting feedback. The V70D and e945 were significantly more sensitive, and the OM5 slightly more sensitive. This means you need to turn up the gain on the pre-amp a little more for the OM2. To evaluate feedback and the sound of the mics, I evened out the gain using software measurement.According to spec sheets, the OM2 does reasonably well with sub-bass frequencies, but only has a usable range up to 16KHz. A wider range isn't especially practical for vocals. I usually use a lo-cut filter around 80Hz to cut down boominess and handling noise. The OM5 has an extended high range if you're micing something that generates those frequencies.I thought the e945, and possibly the OM5 might have sounded a little better than the OM2, but it was very hard to tell. After compensating for the extra gain, and singing without any proximity effect, it was very difficult to detect differences on vocal sources (singing). If sound quality is your concern, you will need high quality studio monitors or headphones and good recording equipment to notice. Even a good PA in an acoustically treated room is not likely to reveal much difference between this OM2 and high-end dynamic, handheld mics.Other factors like build quality, polar pattern, durability, and price are much more noticeable in the one to two hundred dollar range of dynamic vocal mics. The Audix has a build quality that easily beats Shure, Beyerdynamic, and Sennheiser models in the same price range. The e945 and the Telefunken M80 have outstanding build quality, but they should for triple the price of an OM2.I've used OM3 and OM5 in the past, and they proved durable and reliable. I've chosen the OM2 as my standard mic. There are of course special circumstances where another kind of mic will work better, but after evaluating a number of good mics, I found this to be the best for most vocal situations. I would have spent more money if it made a difference (the M80 was the first mic I bought), but I found that it just doesn't.It works out nice that I can save money for wireless mics. I haven't evaluated wireless yet. I would consider the Audix OM2 for wireless as well, but it would have to prove best. I have a lot of experience with Sennheiser wireless, which are outstanding, but around six to eight-hunded dollars per channel. In the mean time, these wired OM2 will serve me well. I'll mostly be using them on boomstands for vocals with guitars and keyboard, so wireless isn't that advantageous yet.

Era un regalo per un mio amico cantante, che lo aveva già provato mesi fa. È molto soddisfatto, lo apprezza molto. Consegna come sempre impeccabile.